top of page

๐“๐ก๐ž ๐‚๐ก๐š๐ฌ๐ž ๐“๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐‚๐ก๐š๐ง๐ ๐ž๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ข๐ญ ๐‹๐š๐ฐ: ๐–๐ก๐ž๐ง ๐ˆ๐ง๐ง๐จ๐œ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐๐ฒ๐ฌ๐ญ๐š๐ง๐๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ ๐๐ž๐œ๐จ๐ฆ๐ž ๐๐ฅ๐š๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐Ÿ๐Ÿ๐ฌ

๐“๐ก๐ž ๐‚๐ก๐š๐ฌ๐ž ๐“๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐‚๐ก๐š๐ง๐ ๐ž๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ข๐ญ ๐‹๐š๐ฐ: ๐–๐ก๐ž๐ง ๐ˆ๐ง๐ง๐จ๐œ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐๐ฒ๐ฌ๐ญ๐š๐ง๐๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ ๐๐ž๐œ๐จ๐ฆ๐ž ๐๐ฅ๐š๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐Ÿ๐Ÿ๐ฌ



A tragic crash near a taco truck just expanded constitutional liability for law enforcement pursuitsโ€”and every officer needs to understand the implications. ๐Ÿš”โš–๏ธ



In Est. of Soakai v. Abdelaziz, the Ninth Circuit delivered a ruling that fundamentally changes how courts view officer duties during high-speed chases.



๐“๐ก๐ž ๐“๐ซ๐š๐ ๐ข๐œ ๐…๐š๐œ๐ญ๐ฌ: Officers pursued a suspect from an illegal car rally. Critical details that proved legally fatal:


* No emergency lights or sirens activated


* No radio notification to dispatch


* One innocent bystander killed, others severely injured


* Officers witnessed the crash but failed to stop, render aid, or summon emergency services



๐“๐ก๐ž ๐‹๐ž๐ ๐š๐ฅ ๐๐ฎ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง: Can injured bystanders sue officers under the Fourteenth Amendment when they weren't the intended subjects of allegedly improper police conduct?


๐“๐ก๐ž ๐๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐ก ๐‚๐ข๐ซ๐œ๐ฎ๐ข๐ญ'๐ฌ ๐‘๐ž๐ฃ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง: The court established two critical principles:


1. Expanded "Purpose to Harm" Liability: Officers owe constitutional duties to ALL those in the vicinity during pursuits. Bystanders can bring Fourteenth Amendment claims even when not specifically targeted.


2. "State-Created Danger" Doctrine: When officers affirmatively place people in danger and then act with deliberate indifference to known consequences, they face additional constitutional liability.



๐“๐ก๐ž ๐‚๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ญ'๐ฌ ๐‘๐ž๐š๐ฌ๐จ๐ง๐ข๐ง๐ : "Although the purpose of a high-speed police chase might be to catch the fleeing motorist, officers owe a duty to all those in the vicinity, including bystanders."



๐‚๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐œ๐š๐ฅ ๐ˆ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ข๐œ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ:


* Pursuit policies must be followed religiously (lights, sirens, radio notification)


* Document decision-making throughout the entire pursuit


* Immediately assess for bystander injuries if accidents occur


* Render aid and summon emergency services without delay



High-speed pursuits will always carry inherent risks, but this ruling emphasizes that how officers conduct themselves before, during, and after those pursuits can determine whether tragedy becomes constitutional liability.



Stay aware of your surroundings. Follow established protocols. When accidents happen, respond as the protector you swore to be.



Questions? Emailย m.busailah@police-defense.comย or call 626-683-5600.

ย 
ย 
ย 

Kommentare


bottom of page